Safety researchers warn of critical zero-day flaws in ‘age gap’ dating app Gaper

‘We identified it was feasible to compromise any account in the application within a 10-minute timeframe’

Critical zero-day weaknesses in Gaper, an ‘age gap’ dating app, could possibly be exploited to compromise any individual account and potentially extort users, protection scientists claim.

The lack of access settings, brute-force security, and authentication that is multi-factor the Gaper software suggest attackers may potentially exfiltrate delicate individual information and usage that data to obtain complete account takeover in a matter of ten full minutes.

More worryingly nevertheless, the assault didn’t leverage “0-day exploits or advanced methods and then we wouldn’t be amazed if this was not previously exploited into the wild”, stated UK-based Ruptura InfoSecurity in a technical write-up posted yesterday (February 17).

Inspite of the obvious gravity of this hazard, scientists stated Gaper neglected to answer numerous tries to contact them via e-mail, their only help channel.

GETting data that are personal

Gaper, which launched during summer of 2019, is just a dating and social networking app geared towards individuals looking for a relationship with more youthful or older women or men.

Ruptura InfoSecurity says the application has around 800,000 users, mostly located in the UK and United States.

Because certificate pinning had not been enforced, the researchers stated it had been feasible to get a manipulator-in-the-middle (MitM) place by using a Burp Suite proxy.

This enabled them to snoop on “HTTPS traffic and functionality” that are easily enumerate.

The scientists then setup a fake account and utilized a GET demand to access the ‘info’ function, which unveiled the user’s session token and individual ID.

This permits an user that is authenticated query any kind of user’s information, “providing they know their user_id value” – that is easily guessed since this value is “simply incremented by one every time a unique user is created”, stated Ruptura InfoSecurity.

“An attacker could iterate through the user_id’s to retrieve a thorough directory of delicate information that would be utilized in further targeted assaults against all users,” including “email address, date of delivery, location and also gender orientation”, they proceeded.

Alarmingly, retrievable information is also thought to consist of user-uploaded pictures, which “are stored within a publicly available, unauthenticated database – potentially ultimately causing situations” that is extortion-like.

Covert brute-forcing

Armed with a summary of individual e-mail details, the scientists opted against releasing a brute-force attack resistant to the login function, as this “could have actually potentially locked every individual associated with application away, which may have triggered a giant level of noise…”.

Rather, protection shortcomings into the forgotten password API and a requirement for “only an authentication that is single offered a far more discrete course “to a whole compromise of arbitrary user accounts”.

The password change API responds to email that is valid with a 200 okay and a contact containing a four-digit PIN number provided for the consumer make it possible for a password reset.

Watching deficiencies in rate restricting protection, the scientists penned an instrument to automatically “request A pin quantity for a legitimate email” before rapidly delivering needs into the API containing different four-digit PIN permutations.

Public disclosure

The security researchers sent three emails to the company, on November 6 and 12, 2020, and January 4, 2021 in their attempt to report the issues to Gaper.

Having gotten no response within ninety days, they publicly disclosed the zero-days consistent with Google’s vulnerability disclosure policy.

“Advice to users is always to disable their records and make sure that the applications they normally use for dating as well as other sensitive and painful actions are suitably protected (at the very least with 2FA),” Tom Heenan, handling manager of Ruptura InfoSecurity, told The constant Swig .

To date (February 18), Gaper has still perhaps perhaps perhaps not answered, he added.

The day-to-day Swig in addition has contacted Gaper for remark and can upgrade the content if so when we hear right straight straight back.

0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *